Fearlessly Embracing the Contraction Taboo

Whether it was war, colonialism, slavery, or technology, this civilisation has learned to survive exclusively through unsustainable strategies of growth.  But we cannot grow ourselves out of our problems anymore when the problem itself has become growth.  What goes up must come down and growth has always led to collapse, as much as we prefer to forget it.  Collapse is the most natural, predictable and probable outcome for an exponentially overgrown system that is eventually brought back down to size by its own physics.  Rather than completely collapse, it is always better to contract.

But scaling ourselves back goes against everything our civilization stands for.  Our skills, our intuition, our brain, have all evolved towards “building” and “growing” themselves out of problems.  Our knee-jerk reaction has always been the same:  invent, construct, innovate.  We find ourselves in an existential, but equally, a cognitive conundrum: how the hell do we contract without “making stuff”? 

By simply learning to take a step back.  The answer would seem obvious, but the message is not getting through.  Even the term “degrowth” is an oxymoron, invented by some economist that was too afraid to utter the word “contract”.  Even many of those who have supposedly embraced degrowth can only process the concept in “growth” terms.  Contraction, inaction and idleness continue to be massive taboos in our work-obsessed psychonomy.  They are counter-intuitive not only to the mainstream business paradigm, but to our culture. 

The concept of contraction simply does not compute for most people as the benefits of contraction, although huge and lifesaving, are largely intangible in conventional, capitalist terms.  Contraction will decimate GDP but make humans happier.  Isn’t happiness what we always wanted? We are not balancing books here.  We are saving the planet so we can save ourselves.  Economic contraction is the biggest non-investment humanity could ever make.  It dwarfs any previous technology or innovation, exactly because it safeguards the very existence of everything we have come to know as Earth.  

George is an author, researcher, molecular biologist and food scientist.

Follow me on tsakraklides.bsky.social

Discover my Books Here


Discover more from George Tsakraklides

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

3 thoughts on “Fearlessly Embracing the Contraction Taboo

  1. George: Would you kindly send me the phonetic pronunciation of your last name. I want to tell my friends about your posts, but I don’t want to butcher the pronunciation of your last name. Kind regards,

    >

  2. Who remembers after the great financial crash of 2008 when the entire field of economics 101 was so terrified of saying ‘decline’ they made up one of the best bullshit terms I’ve ever heard – Negative Growth.

    Mind your language: ‘Negative growth’ is a nonsensical term that needs to be locked down

    06 May 2020

    “As the global economy contracts in the face of lockdowns and related measures to curb the Covid-19 pandemic, there has been an apparent surge in the nonsensical term, negative growth. Its widespread usage even among highly-literate commentators and economists speaks to the spells cast by the concept of gross domestic product. Bleach won’t wipe it out. What is needed is a dictionary.”

    https://www.dailymaverick.co.za/article/2020-05-06-mind-your-language-negative-growth-is-a-nonsensical-term-that-needs-to-be-locked-down/

    Economist are of the priestly class whose job description throughout all of human history has been to legitimize the system and those at the top of it under any and all circumstances. The 2008 crash was a massive failure of the system, so what did the priests come up with to normalize and legitimize? Field banks are too big to fail and economic contraction is ‘negative growth’. Back in the day, the great George Carlin did a bit on this abuse of the language by TPTB.

    George Carlin on soft language

Leave a reply to George Tsakraklides Cancel reply