Truth Wars: The Bot Industry of Climate Denial

24 hours after the US election 400 of my X followers disappeared, and the list just keeps growing.  Fellow climate activists reported similar figures.  I guess all those bots aren’t needed now that Putin, Trump and Musk, with the help of Kamala and her BAU friends, have achieved their objective to put the climate crisis out of existence in peoples’ minds, even as climate disasters amplify.

I was asked during an interview about my last book why I believed that “the climate crisis would eventually become completely forgotten”.  They thought I was either joking or exaggerating.  I was doing neither, and events have proved me correct.  The climate crisis didn’t even feature in the US election’s campaigns, all the while as people died across the globe and in the US. 

Over the past few years, but especially in the past year and a half, all of my tweets were overwhelmed by bot replies aiming to drown the conversation with fabricated information.  I of course blocked them, but new ones emerged every day.  The amount of effort that these Twitter bots put into trying in vain to make me go crazy has been immense, and of course, somebody must have paid for them: probably Mr Musk et al. 

The replies to my tweets weren’t just nasty.  They were sophisticated and customized responses aiming to throw doubt over the existence of the climate crisis.  The sheer volume of these replies, the eloquent breadth of words used and specificity to the subject matter of my original tweet was astounding, given that they all came from bot accounts with cartoon characters or other fake photos as profile images. 

We may call these “bots”, but they are not dumb.  These are incredibly eloquent AI programs, which can be trained specifically on a particular subject matter of conversation, in this case the climate crisis, and given very specific instructions: “write something to contradict the existence of the climate crisis based on this particular tweet”, or, “write something to make the author feel attacked, based on any information you know about them personally from the web”.  Moreover, these tweets were often accompanied by falsified charted data of CO2, global temperature etc which could be easily a response to the instruction “make up a chart illustrating the decrease of global temperature over the past 300 years”. 

So without further ado, here are examples of some of my all-time favourites over the years:

“Yup, rain happens on Earth, so does flood.  Deal with it.”

“The climate crisis isn’t caused by humans.  It is caused by the sun”

“The Earth is greening because of the extra CO2”

“Degrowth yourself”

“Says someone using electricity, tweeting from their smartphone”

“Let’s start with you George.  Why don’t you off yourself”

“Says a faggot”

The fact that these sophisticated bots exist in the first place and receive such heavy sponsorship, means that the media is where the climate battle takes place. Musk and Putin may have won for now, but at least we got into their wallets just as they are getting into ours.  In my opinion, the climate movement must do the same.  We need the best hackers, the best AI programmers to help us blanket-bomb this asleep civilisation with the truth.

George is an author, researcher, molecular biologist and food scientist. You can follow him on Twitter @99blackbaloons

Discover my Books Here


Discover more from George Tsakraklides

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

4 thoughts on “Truth Wars: The Bot Industry of Climate Denial

  1. And yesterday, I, who am not a bot, got locked out of X. No explanation. Said “We have to see if you’re a human” and I did the little visual exercise. Then “Something went wrong” and after repeated tries, “You’ve exceeded the number of tries. Please try again later.” Could just be ordinary computer weirdness, could be Israeli hasbara, who knows? Anyway, glad I’ve signed up for your newsletter!

  2. About losing followers, it is also that some of them have likely decided to quit Twitter altogether, given its owner’s role (Elon Musk) and stance during the US election, and are instead following you now on another platform. That’s what I did. I understand why you maintain a presence on X despite its decline over the past 2 years, if only to give your books greater exposure. But many of its former users like me it’s rather pointless to stay there when they are now more welcoming and constructive platforms. Just the example you bring up about the bots that polluted the replies to your posts, that’s enough to get people fed up with the constant nonsense going on over there.

Leave a reply to George Tsakraklides Cancel reply